Leaders' TikTok Obsession: Too Much for Serious Information?
We have observed that in recent years, Tiktok has become one of the most utilized apps in the world, predominantly by the younger audience. In this app, people produce a lot of content and one of the main videos people tend to see daily on Tiktok is the spread of information, and political videos are not the exception.
It has caught our attention tha lately, a lot of leaders have decided to use Tiktok to reach a wider audience, especially young people since they are considered as the future of the country. The use of Tiktok means that leaders can catch the attention of the people many times in a day, they can inform in a lot of creative ways the achievements the government has had, the videos in the app can also help people understand in an easier way a complex topic, they also focus on trying to persuade people of their ideology and gain more supporters or followers, etc. However, as advantageous as Tiktok can be, it also has a lot of negative aspects that can damage a leader’s reputation.
Since this app is relatively new for many people and can offer a lot of different easygoing contents, for some people, especially not the younger audience, leaders using Tiktok can be seen as very informal, a lot of people might not take the leader in a serious way, reducing them to leaders who just create videos instead of working for their country. This way, the videos they create can be misinterpreted too, their own words and actions can be completely taken out of context, creating mixed feeling in the citizens and various bad opinions, reviews and visions about a president, this can also cause a wave of hate towards the leaders. Though people tend to forget about these things, the record of the leader will be stained forever.
From our point of view, this new and exploited practice is a double-edged sword, although it allows the quick diffusion of information, its excesive use can make the message less serious. An example of this is the Ecuadorian president: Daniel Noboa, who in recent weeks has received several criticisms from politicians and the population, for not seeming like a respectable figure but rather a caricature of a president, something that we deeply despise.
The growing obsession of leaders with TikTok raises critical questions. While TikTok helps reach younger audiences, its brevity risks oversimplifying complex issues, reducing public discourse to sound bites.
ResponderEliminarIs this platform suitable for the nuanced discussions necessary for policymaking? Moreover, prioritizing social media popularity over substantive engagement could undermine leaders' credibility and public trust.
Are resources being diverted from more impactful governance methods? While TikTok offers connection opportunities, it’s crucial to ensure it enhances rather than diminishes the quality of political discourse. Leaders must balance visibility with maintaining a professional and effective public image.
This post touches on a big issue in today's world: how leaders talk to people, especially young people, using new tech like TikTok. It's tricky because TikTok lets leaders reach many people quickly, but it might make them seem less serious.
ResponderEliminarOn one side, it's good that leaders want to connect with younger folks but on the other side, TikTok is mostly for fun, short videos. Big, complex ideas about running a country don't always fit well in that format.
The example of Ecuador's president shows the problem clearly. He's trying to be modern and relatable, but some people think he looks silly, not like a real leader.
This all points to a bigger question: How can leaders be both easy to understand and still respected? As the world changes, leaders are trying new ways to talk to people but we need to think about whether these new ways are actually good for democracy and good leadership.
This post is really useful to understan that the use of TikTok by political leaders is indeed a double-edged sword. On one hand, it provides an innovative and engaging platform to inform a younger audience, breaking down complex topics into easily digestible content. This can enhance transparency and relatability, making politics more accessible to the masses. However, the flip side is that excessive use can lead to a loss of gravitas, potentially undermining a leader's credibility and the seriousness of their office. As seen with Ecuadorian President Daniel Noboa, the balance between being relatable and maintaining respectability is delicate.
ResponderEliminarThe post analyzes the growing trend of world leaders using TikTok as a platform to communicate with a younger audience. It seems to me that this post expresses in a broad and deep way which are the positive and negative aspects of this trend and which can be the consequences of the use of social networks as a political impulse. It is necessary to emphasize that we must be careful with the excessive growth of political activity on social networks, as we can fall into misinformation and populist acts. Especially when we observe political leaders on these platforms, we must analyze the content that is uploaded and its credibility.
ResponderEliminarTikTok social network is very useful to send messages clearly and easily to the population. However, politicians cannot use TikTok as the only tool to communicate their work proposals and political activities. It is also necessary for political actors to communicate their work through official pages, formal documents and more detailed reports that include technical aspects that are not usually communicated on TikTok.
ResponderEliminar